Rachel
Burnham writes: The #LDInsight chat question discussed this
week was ‘How can L&D support other HR functions eg recruitment, talent
management, ER?’ and as is usually the case this generated lots of discussion,
thought and some disagreement. Here is a
link to the Storify if you want to find out more.
I was particularly struck again by the difference between
those, like myself, who see L&D as a part of HR and those who see L&D
as quite distinct and separate from HR.
This issue has come up before on other occasions in #LDInsight
chats. This is familiar territory for
me as it is a subject that almost always comes up with each new group that I
tutor for the CIPD Certificate in L&D for MOL Learn.
My experience is that very many people coming into the
L&D profession come seeing L&D as different and as distinct from
HR. This is usually because in their
organisation L&D (or training) is organised as a separate team from HR,
perhaps with few links (or few positive links) with HR and a different focus to
their work. And of course, there are
some ‘trainers’ whose work is customer focused, supporting their organisation’s
clients to use their products and services effective (eg with specialist
software or equipment); and there are other ‘trainers’ from training providers,
who sometimes model their approach more from an educational model of delivery. It is easy to imagine that the whole world
mirrors your own experience – I’ve certainly done that and often people
starting out in L&D only have limited networks within the L&D
profession to challenge that perception.
One of the joys of my work is encouraging conversations
between fellow students to explore the differences and similarities between
their organisations and how they organise their L&D work, including that
relationship with HR. And in supporting
them in developing wider networks amongst the HR profession, including
L&Ders, so that they have access to other perspectives and get a deep
understanding of the importance of context.
I usually learn lots from this too about different sectors, different
organisational cultures, specific niche markets and so on.
Sometimes, though this view of the separateness and
distinctiveness of L&D and HR is also held with people with many years of
experience of L&D. I know
individuals who cite poor experiences of HR within their organisation or
business sector and who identify this as the root of their wish to distance
themselves from a bureaucratic and rule-driven HR. And of course there are undoubtedly HR
functions who are like this. And many HR
functions who are not. There are even
some L&D teams, who I might quite like to distance myself from – content-dumping, over-powerpoint using, push
button e-learning compliance chasing, irrelevant to real organisational needs and
slow to respond teams.
I think there is real value in seeing L&D as part of
HR. L&D and the other specialisms
that make up HR are a bit like a family or group of house mates sharing a house
– at our best when we work together.
Sometimes there are disagreements between house mates/family members
about X not pulling their weight and doing their share of the cleaning. Sometimes, the writing on the shopping list
is a bit unclear and the wrong items are bought by the designated shopper. And sometimes, everyone is sat in their own room
each watching a TV programme on a different device and not speaking to each
other – though in fact everyone is watching the same programme.
In fact, we cannot afford not to work together. Just think of the damage done to an
organisation when recruitment and L&D responsibilities for induction don’t
work effectively. Or when reward
policies pull in the opposite direction to the change programme OD is working
on. Or when line managers find that HR rules ‘prevent’ them from using ideas
developed on a recent L&D programme.
But I would draw the net wider too. I think we in L&D need to be talking and
working with other teams and stakeholders too.
It is increasingly important that we have effective working relationships
with IT, given how important technology is to enabling modern workplace
learning. We need to be connecting with
Internal Comms – again there are lots of potential overlaps here particularly
with engagement and seeing learning opportunities as a campaign rather than a
one-off programme. I also think we need
links with teams such as Health & Safety and Compliance/Quality and
finance. Which is, of course, in
addition to working alongside operational teams and their managers.
One of the things that I think helps to get this working
together, is being clear about where the focus is in L&D. For me, Mervyn Dinnen nailed it with his
tweet in the #LDInsight chat when he said ‘Only one strategy. The business strategy.
That’s the one you need to understand and speak.’ We share responsibility for delivering on
this with the rest of HR and all the other functions and teams across the
organisation.
In L&D
we are starting, at last, to focus more on impact on peformance, not just
learning. And this is something we need
to work together on with the rest of HR and across the organisation. It isn’t something that can be tackled in
isolation. As being our ‘precious’.
If we
focus on the business strategy and performance improvement then we will need to
work together. And we will be better
together.
(The title of this blog was tugging at my memory and I
realised that ‘Better Together’ is the title of a track by Jack Johnson, so
here is the link. Have rather surprised
myself by remembering this piece, as I usually only remember jazz & hymn
tunes! )
Rachel
Burnham
5/6/16
Burnham L & D Consultancy helps L&D
professionals become even more effective.
I am particularly interested in blended learning, the uses of social
media for learning, evaluation and anything that improves the impact of
learning on performance.
No comments:
Post a Comment