Rachel Burnham writes: As you are probably aware, from April 2017, the
government will be introducing the apprenticeship levy on all employers with a
pay bill of more than £3 million per year.
The levy, set at 0.5% of the pay bill, will be paid through PAYE. Employers, including those too small to pay
the levy, will then be able to access funding to pay for apprenticeships
through the new digital apprenticeship service.
Back in June 2016,
CIPD reported on employer views of the proposals for the apprenticeship levy –
my take on the research is broadly that the more employers knew about the
proposals for the levy, the less they liked them! However, the government is pressing ahead,
so employers need to work out how to get the most benefit out of this new
system for their organisation and for apprentices.
It was in that spirit
that CIPD Manchester’s Public Policy Panel last week hosted three employers all
with existing apprenticeship schemes to come and share this experience, plus
their thoughts on the levy, with other HR professionals. Our speakers were from Eurocell, AO and the
General Medical Council and included two schemes with 25-30 apprentices and one
scheme with 5 apprentices from the private and charitable sectors. The range of apprenticeships offered was
very varied from including engineering, HR, IT and digital marketing. Here is a link to the Storify from that evening.
Effective apprenticeship programmes
Our speakers
identified a number of elements that contributed to an effective apprenticeship
programme. These included:
·
A genuine
business need for apprentices
·
Senior
management sponsorship of the programme and local line management sponsorship
of individual apprentices. Line managers
will benefit from preparation, clarifying their expectations of the apprentice
role and how they will need to work with them, plus acknowledgement that they
will need to invest time in supporting the apprentice.
·
A
responsibly agreed salary.
·
Good
quality, relevant training and long term development opportunities. This training could be provided internally
with suitable accreditation or delivered by an external provider depending upon
what best meets the needs of the organisation and fits within the
Apprenticeship Levy requirements. One of the speakers identified that they
needed to constantly work with their external training providers to ensure that
the training meets their needs. It is essential that the training provided
meets both the needs of the organisation and also the individual’s needs – this
can mean tailoring the length of a programme to ensure that the pace fits these
needs. One of the employers was
exploring the possibility of introducing degree level apprenticeships to meet
organisational requirements, but also to stretch and reward individuals
appropriately.
·
We
heard about a range of exciting component parts of the programmes such as:
including achieving a Duke of Edinburgh award; opportunities for
volunteering/charity work; parents evenings to share with parents what the
programme involves and the benefits to participants; and possibilities for international links where
organisations have international operations eg with Germany. All of which help to build the confidence of
apprenticeships, provide opportunities for team working and increasing
responsibility plus times to celebrate these gains.
Benefits from apprenticeships
All the employers
described the growth in confidence and skills shown by the apprentices – one said
you can see them striding out across the workplace ‘with a sense of purpose’.
But they also identified
the benefits to the organisation particularly in relation to providing access
to high quality candidates for junior roles. For example, one of the
organisations described how the apprentices, when applying for roles within the
organisation on completion of their apprenticeship, scored much higher than
candidates from other sources and described how they had moved into much higher
level roles than expected. Another of
the employers identified one of the challenges as being to remember that they
are apprentices because they start adding value so quickly within their teams
and they need to have their time protected to enable them to have the time to
complete all their studies as well as their work.
Thoughts on the Levy
From the discussions at
the session there are many different ways that organisations are approaching
the levy:
·
For
some it is business as usual – the organisation has already decided to invest
in apprenticeships and nothing will fundamentally change.
·
Some
organisations have considered the levy, but have decided not to bother with it
and just pay the levy, seeing it as another tax, even though as a large
organisation this will leave them with a large bill. In an example shared during the meeting, the
levy had been studied, but the organisation decided that it was not worthwhile
them putting things in place to enable them to make use of the funding from the
Levy. Interestingly, prior to the
meeting, I had assumed that this was more likely to be the approach of small
organisations, but this seems to be the case also for some large organisations.
·
Some
organisations fear that the apprenticeship levy will absorb all the resources
for training and that therefore all funding for learning & development will
need to come through programmes supported by the Levy. This view wasn’t expressed in the meeting,
but I have heard it elsewhere.
·
A
number of organisations in the meeting were identifying that they will only be
able to spend a proportion (eg two thirds) of the funding for apprentices that
their organisation will be eligible for, because not all costs are recoverable
such as apprentice salaries.
·
Some
organisations were still working out how they will approach the Levy and how
this will affect their work with apprentices.
·
One
of the opportunities touched on is the potential for organisations to work
together to deliver apprenticeships eg
organisations from a similar sector either in partnership or perhaps a larger
organisation opening up their scheme in some way to smaller organisations in
the same field or within their supply chain particularly where this is in a
specialist field.
Challenges with the Levy
One of the key challenges with
the Levy for organisations is that there is still a lot of uncertainty about
how various elements will work in practice.
A particular aspect of this is whether the relevant qualification
frameworks for your organisation will be available in time – a large number of
new frameworks are being developed quite quickly and there are some questions about
whether the process for developing these has been sufficiently robust to ensure
that each framework meets the needs of a sector and not just an individual
organisation. One of the employers
shared how the Level 4 qualification that some of their apprentices need to
move on to during the year is unlikely to be ready in time and what the
implications of this are for those individuals.
A different issue was the
opportunity to have apprenticeships not just for young people, but also for
people of all ages, including apprenticeships to support career changes later
in life. Two specific challenges were
mentioned in this connection, paying the right level of salary for this to be
feasible and the issue of English and Maths qualifications in the final
assessment process - older apprentices qualifications may be regarded as earned
too long ago to be counted, meaning they may need to requalify in order to
complete the apprenticeship. This will
need to be handled sensitively in order for this not to become a barrier.
The overall public perception of apprenticeships was discussed and whether the branding of apprenticeships needs to be changed or just our perceptions – the parents evenings mentioned previously and similar events could play a part in this. Interestingly one of the employers describes their apprenticeship work under the banner of ‘emerging talent’, whilst other people suggested a broader skills development or grassroots programme as better labels.
The overall public perception of apprenticeships was discussed and whether the branding of apprenticeships needs to be changed or just our perceptions – the parents evenings mentioned previously and similar events could play a part in this. Interestingly one of the employers describes their apprenticeship work under the banner of ‘emerging talent’, whilst other people suggested a broader skills development or grassroots programme as better labels.
Finally, we touched on a specific
challenge in the public sector following on from the requirement placed by the
government to have 2.3% of staff as apprentices, year on year. This may contradict the advice that
apprenticeships are most effective when they meet a real need within the
organisation.
There are clearly a great many
benefits to be gained from a positive engagement with apprenticeships both for
organisations and for individual apprenticeships. However, there are many challenges to making
the Apprenticeship Levy work both for individual organisations and in terms of
its overall impact on the UK workforce and economy. We are only at the start of identifying the
what these challenges are, never mind finding the answers.
What issues has your organisation
identified with the Levy? How prepared
is your organisation for April 2017? Why
not share your thoughts on this topic?
Rachel
Burnham
12/12/16
Rachel is CIPD Manchester’s Public Policy Adviser in a
voluntary capacity and is the Director of Burnham L&D Consultancy.
Burnham L & D Consultancy helps L&D
professionals update and refresh their skills.
I am particularly interested in blended learning, the uses of social
media for learning, evaluation and anything that improves the impact of
learning on performance.